A recent cross-sectional study1 found about 19% of dementia prevalence might have resulted from visual impairments that are largely correctable, according to first author Jason R. Smith, ScM, from the Department of Epidemiology and the Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore.
He and his colleagues advocated prevention and treatment of visual impairments, ie, distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, to lower the prevalence rate of dementia.
The investigators explained that because the prevalence rate of dementia is rising global, addressing modifiable risk factors is a priority for preventing the disease.2-4 Visual impairment has been consistently identified as a “robust risk factor” in the development of dementia.5-8 Because vision impairment affects up to 28% of those older than 70 years,9,10 the proportion of dementia resulting from vision impairment might be considerable.
The researchers conducted this population-based cross-sectional analysis in the National Health and Aging Trends Study,11 which gathers nationally representative information in the US on Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. A total of 2,767 community-dwelling adults were included.
The main outcomes were the adjusted population attributable fractions (PAFs) (defined as a measure of how much a risk factor contributes to disease or death in a population) of prevalent dementia, defined using a standardized algorithmic diagnosis (≥1.5 standard deviations below the mean on 1 or more cognitive domains, self- or proxy-reported dementia diagnosis, or the Ascertain Dementia-8 Dementia Screening Interview Score of probable dementia.
Smith and colleagues reported that the survey-weighted prevalence of vision impairment among participants aged 71 and older was 32.2%. The participants were 54.7% female, 8.0% non-Hispanic Black, 81.7% Hispanic, 81.7% non-Hispanic White, and 3.3% non-Hispanic other.
“The PAF of prevalent dementia from at least 1 vision impairment was 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-29.7). Contrast sensitivity impairment yielded the strongest attributable fraction among all impairments (15.0%; 95% CI, 6.6-23.6), followed by near acuity (9.7%; 95% CI, 2.6-17.0), and distance acuity (4.9%; 95% CI, 0.1-9.9). PAFs from at least 1 visual impairment were highest among participants aged 71 to 79 years (24.3%; 95% CI, 6.6-41.8), female (26.8%; 95% CI, 12.2-39.9), and non-Hispanic White (22.3%; 95% CI, 9.6-34.5) subpopulations, with estimates consistent across educational strata,” the authors reported.
They commented that the PAFs of dementia from vision impairments ranged from 4.9% to 19.0%; however, although this is not a cause-and-effect relationship, “these findings support inclusion of multiple objective measures of vision impairments, including contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, to capture the total potential impact of addressing vision impairment on dementia.”
Because contrast sensitivity was associated with the largest PAF, this indicated that the total impact of vision impairment on dementia should be quantified using measures beyond just distance visual acuity.